-
Al-Farhan Tries to Distract Public Opinion with Allegations of Exploiting the Alawite Sect
-
The delays and concealment in the committee's work reveal deep concerns about the credibility of the investigations and their ability to uncover the truth in a transparent and objective manner
The fact-finding committee in coastal areas continues its series of statements amid increasing doubts about its credibility and ability to uncover the truth. The committee’s spokesperson, Yasser al-Farhan, attempted to clarify its work in parallel with widespread criticism.
In stammering statements, al-Farhan justified the continued concealment of the investigation results, claiming that the time had not yet come to reveal the identities of those involved. However, observers argue that this is a clear attempt to evade responsibility, as he offered a series of excuses and justifications that only fueled suspicions about the committee’s true intentions.
Al-Farhan tried to distract public opinion by talking about alleged attempts to ignite a civil war, pointing to vague parties who sought to exploit the Alawite sect, which, according to followers, is a transparent strategy to pass violations and divert attention from essential facts.
Despite the committee's claims of transparency and professionalism, it has only provided superficial and unconvincing information. Al-Farhan spoke about analyzing 93 video clips but refrained from presenting any tangible evidence or specific results that could be verified.
The committee's way of working raises many questions, especially with its insistence on not revealing the involved parties under the pretext of respecting international standards. According to observers, it was clear that this propaganda was nothing more than an attempt to cover up facts that could be embarrassing and shameful.
In a desperate attempt to gain sympathy, al-Farhan claimed that the committee was completely independent, ignoring the fact that it was formed by a decision from the transitional authorities. His attempts to defend the committee's integrity seemed more like a farce than the truth, according to observers.
Amidst this deliberate ambiguity, fundamental questions arose: Will the committee succeed in uncovering the truth, or will it merely serve as a media front to pass violations? The answer seems clear in light of the ongoing delays and concealment.
