Libyans Reject Return of Morality Police: A Restriction on Personal Freedoms
The announcement of morality police's return in Libya reflects sharp social division between supporters of personal freedoms and those calling for restrictions under the pretext of protecting values
November 7, 2024, 7:51 pm

Libyans Reject Return of Morality Police: A Restriction on Personal Freedoms

ليبيا

The Interior Minister of Libya's Government of National Unity, Emad Al-Tarabulsi, sparked intense social debate in recent hours following his announcement to resume "morality police operations in streets to confront behaviors violating society's traditions".

During a media interview Wednesday, Tarabulsi announced that morality police patrols would resume duties next month, confirming they would address "strange" haircuts and youth clothing that contradicts society's customs and traditions. He emphasized requiring women to wear modest clothing in public spaces and called on the Education Ministry to mandate hijab for female students.

He addressed banning women's travel without a male guardian, noting the need to activate female police to deter women's immoral behaviors and prevent mixed-gender presence in cafes and public places.

He continued with threats to detain violators and raid homes if people are proven involved in immoral acts, adding that those "seeking personal freedom should go to Europe."

These statements sparked widespread debate among Libyans on social media platforms, between supporters of the decision "to limit moral deterioration in society" as described, and opponents who see it as a restriction on freedoms and regression.

Libyan activist Amira Youssef expressed her position saying, "There's a difference between maintaining public morals and imposing ISIS laws," addressing the Interior Minister: "We are against nudity, vulgarity, drugs, alcohol, and corruption of all kinds and anything affecting public morals, but imposing specific clothing on young girls, preventing women from traveling without a guardian, preventing us from eating in public places, and saying that whoever seeks personal freedom should go to Europe - it remains only to declare that Libya is an extension of ISIS until the international community and human rights organizations intervene to express their positions."

A Facebook blogger considered the statements tragic, describing them as "an attempt to spread and impose extremist thought in schools, curricula, and streets." Blogger Sanad Al-Shami denounced the decision, considering that "sound thinking doesn't need a stick or morality police to establish it, but requires directing state capabilities, budget, and priorities towards education."

Other citizens questioned why the focus isn't on combating corruption, expired goods, and pursuing public funds plunderers. A minority of Libyans supported "returning morality police to work," considering it "a step in the right direction after corruption spread and values were transgressed."

Libya has witnessed since the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi's regime in 2011 a state of turmoil, lack of security, and political confusion, amid the country's division between two authorities in the east and west.

Levant-Agencies

U.S. Defense Secretary Confirms Military's Neutrality in the Coming Phase Ukrainian President Warns Against Compromising with Putin as Trump Returns

Upon arriving to participate in the summit of the European Political Community, which includes around forty heads of state in Budapest, he said, "I look forward to sitting with the elected U.S. president and seeing how we will collectively ensure we meet challenges, including the threats from Russia and North Korea." He also noted that the strengthening of ties between Russia and North Korea poses a threat to the United States as well, according to reports from Agence France-Presse.

Before Trump's victory, Rutte expressed confidence that a united Washington would remain part of the defensive alliance, even if Trump became the 47th president of the United States. In an interview with German public broadcaster ZDF last Monday night, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats understand that NATO serves not only the security of Europe but also that of America. He added that both candidates are aware that the security of the United States is closely tied to NATO.

On Wednesday, NATO congratulated Trump on his victory but did not address the Ukrainian issue.

It is noteworthy that the relationship between the elected U.S. president and the defense alliance was not the best during his first term in the White House. Trump criticized NATO member states multiple times and even hinted at withdrawing from the alliance unless they increased their financial contributions.

Additionally, the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian war is one of the matters that complicate relations between the two sides, especially since Trump has repeatedly stated that he can end this ongoing conflict, which began in 2022, quickly. He implied that he had a peace plan between Kyiv and Moscow, while his vice president, JD Vance, revealed aspects of that plan, which stipulated Ukraine's commitment not to join NATO, thereby sending reassuring signals to the Russians.

Furthermore, many NATO member states in Europe fear that Trump might halt military aid to Ukraine after he previously criticized the U.S. for pouring funds into supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.